Recruiters face a demanding workload. While they conduct interviews, a significant portion of their day is dedicated to screening candidates—a process that ultimately filters the candidate pool for interviews. Screening often includes a brief resume prescreen and an initial phone screen. These phone screens, typically lasting 3–5 minutes, are used to quickly verify key information such as work eligibility, basic skills, and other “knock‑out” criteria. In many organizations, this combined evaluation (approximately 3 minutes for a resume review plus 10 minutes for a phone screen, totaling about 13 minutes per candidate) is the leading activity that feeds into the interview pipeline.
However, despite an 8‑hour workday, studies show that distractions (a 1‑hour lunch, two 15‑minute breaks, coffee and washroom trips, meetings, and casual conversations) leave recruiters with only about 2.5–4 hours (roughly 225 minutes) of truly focused work time on average. In a best‑case (optimistic) scenario, some might achieve up to 6.5 hours (390 minutes) of productive time—but that is uncommon.
This whitepaper compares current manual screening workflows with the potential productivity gains from using AI Voice Agents for screening. By automating routine screening—without eliminating interviews—the AI frees recruiters to focus on “Value‑Added Interactions” (in‑depth interviews, pre‑employment checks, reference verifications, etc.) that drive better hiring outcomes.
Methodology and Assumptions
- Combined Candidate Evaluation (Manual Screening):
- Resume Prescreen: ~3 minutes per candidate
- Phone Screen: ~10 minutes per candidate
- Total: ~13 minutes per candidate evaluation
- Note: In practice, the very quick prescreen (around 7 seconds per resume) to filter out unqualified candidates is not fully captured but does add to the workload.
- Interview Durations (Including Prep and Wrap‑Up):
- A nominal 30‑minute phone screen is adjusted to 45 minutes
- A nominal 60‑minute interview is adjusted to 75 minutes
- Productive Time per Day:
- Average Scenario: 225 minutes of focused work
- Optimistic Scenario: 390 minutes of focused work (6.5 hours) – though this is less common due to normal workday distractions.
Table 1. Manual Workflow – Combined Screening & Interviews
(These numbers represent the number of complete candidate evaluations (combined screening) and interviews a recruiter can perform in one productive day. The workflow splits show different proportions of the day devoted to screening versus interviewing.)
| Workflow Split | Screenings (Candidate Evaluations) | 30‑min Interviews (alotted 45 min each) | 60‑min Interviews (alotted 75 min each) |
| 75% Screening / 25% Interviews | Average: 12 evaluations Optimistic: 22 evaluations | Average: 1 interview Optimistic: 2 interviews | Average: 0 interviews Optimistic: 1 interview |
| 50% Screening / 50% Interviews | Average: 8 evaluations Optimistic: 15 evaluations | Average: 2 interviews Optimistic: 4 interviews | Average: 1 interview Optimistic: 2 interviews |
| 25% Screening / 75% Interviews | Average: 4 evaluations Optimistic: 7 evaluations | Average: 3 interviews Optimistic: 6 interviews | Average: 2 interviews Optimistic: 3 interviews |
Notes:
- In the 75/25 split, most of the day (75%) is devoted to screening, resulting in fewer interviews.
- In the 50/50 split, screening and interviews each get half of the productive time.
- In the 25/75 split, more time is allocated to interviews, increasing the number of interviews but reducing screening output.
- All numbers are rounded down to reflect that partial evaluations or interviews aren’t possible.
Table 2. Dedicated Interview Workflow (Screening Fully Offloaded to AI)
When AI Voice Agents handle all screening tasks, recruiters can use 100% of their productive time for interviews.
| Interview Type | Average Productivity (225 min/day) | Optimistic Productivity (390 min/day) |
| 30‑min Interviews (Adjusted to 45 min each) | 225 ÷ 45 = 5 interviews | 390 ÷ 45 ≈ 8 interviews |
| 60‑min Interviews (Adjusted to 75 min each) | 225 ÷ 75 = 3 interviews | 390 ÷ 75 = 5 interviews |
Additional recruiter tasks (offers, negotiations, background checks, meetings, paperwork, etc.) are not included in these calculations—but they further reduce the available time for interviews.
Table 3. Monthly Workload Comparison: Manual Screening vs. AI Capacity
Assume a Starter plan for AI Voice Agents covers 500 completed screening calls per month. This table compares how many workdays a human recruiter would need to manually complete 500 combined candidate evaluations versus the AI’s capacity.
| Method | Daily Output (Combined Screening) | Workdays Needed for 500 Calls (Average) | Workdays Needed for 500 Calls (Optimistic) |
| Manual (Combined Screening) | Average: 225 ÷ 13 ≈ 17 evaluations/day | 500 ÷ 17 ≈ 29 workdays | 500 ÷ 30 ≈ 16 workdays |
| AI Voice Agents | Processes 500 calls concurrently | 500 calls processed in a few hours | 500 calls processed in a few hours |
Note:
- These numbers reflect only the candidate evaluations that reach the phone screen stage. In practice, recruiters also perform very quick prescreens (approximately 7 seconds per resume) to eliminate unqualified candidates—adding to the workload.
- The key takeaway is that while a recruiter would need 16–29 workdays to complete 500 screening calls, AI Voice Agents can process the same volume in a matter of hours. This means the work that normally takes weeks can be done almost instantaneously, ensuring a pipeline of well‑qualified candidates is available for interviews.
The Value Proposition: What’s in It for Your Team?
Current Challenges:
- Recruiters are often bogged down by routine screening tasks, which may yield only 17–30 candidate evaluations per day.
- When time is split between screening and interviews, the number of quality candidate interactions (Value‑Added Interactions) is limited—resulting in only 2–7 interviews per day (depending on the split and interview length).
With AI Voice Agents:
- AI can process hundreds of screening calls concurrently. For instance, a Starter plan covering 500 completed screening calls per month is equivalent to about 29 workdays of manual screening (Average) or 16 workdays (Optimistic)—all delivered in a few hours.
- This dramatically frees up recruiter time. Instead of spending 16–29 workdays on screening, recruiters can dedicate their entire productive time to conducting in‑depth interviews.
- Imagine logging into your ATS and finding a fully pre‑ranked candidate pipeline, complete with call recordings and evaluation notes, ready for review. Recruiters can then focus on Value‑Added Interactions like 30‑ to 60‑minute interviews (adjusted to 45 or 75 minutes) that lead to better candidate assessments and ultimately higher quality hires.
- Importantly, implementing AI Voice Agents isn’t equivalent to hiring one additional person—the AI can handle multiple processes concurrently, far surpassing the one‑at‑a‑time limitation of human recruiters.
Conclusion
This whitepaper illustrates that under current manual processes:
- A recruiter might manually perform 17–30 candidate evaluations per day through a combined screening workflow.
- Splitting time between screening and interviews further reduces throughput, limiting recruiters to only 2–7 interviews per day.
- Manually processing 500 screening calls in a month could require 29 workdays (Average) or 16 workdays (Optimistic)—a workload that AI Voice Agents can complete in just a few hours.
By offloading routine screening tasks to AI Voice Agents, organizations free recruiters to focus on high‑value, strategic interactions. This reallocation of time not only increases the number of in‑depth interviews conducted per day (5–8 short interviews or 3–5 long interviews) but also leads to better candidate assessments and improved hiring outcomes. In short, AI Voice Agents unlock the recruiter’s potential by converting weeks of manual screening into nearly instantaneous results, allowing teams to make faster, more informed hiring decisions.
Sources: